When it comes to on-time graduation, it should be no surprise that major fit matters. Education researchers Allen and Robbins (2010) found that students with higher levels of “interest-major congruence”—a measure for how well students’ interests align with their academic (i.e. major) environment—are more likely to graduate in four years.
Determining a best-fit major requires students to choose from hundreds of possible program options, so academic exploration is critical to making an informed major choice. However, unbounded exploration can result in significant delays in degree progress.
EAB’s Student Success Collaborative used data from more than 46,500 graduates to examine the relationship between term of first or last major declaration and time to degree. The research established that there is an optimal period for students to spend exploring before declaring their first major—the “productive exploration window.” This window falls between the second and fourth semester of study. Students who first declare a major during this time are more likely to graduate in four years than students who declare before or after the window.
The productive exploration window provides three key lessons:
1. Academic exploration has an expiration date.
There is a clear time-to-degree penalty for students who declare their first major after the fifth term of study.
2. It's better to be right than (too) fast.
Surprisingly, declaring a major upon entry was associated with longer time to degree in comparison to students who declared after taking time to explore. This finding may be due to students persisting with poor-fit majors for too long—a not uncommon scenario in nursing and engineering departments.
3. Late major switching impedes timely degree completion.
Major switching will not necessarily delay time to degree, unless the last major switch occurs after sophomore year. This tends to add more than six months to time to degree. Notably, 35% of the student sample made their final major declaration after this critical point.
Too often, students do not conduct thorough research before selecting a major; instead they rely on advice from family and friends and may choose an initial major that doesn’t actually align to their career interests. To help students pinpoint their career interests before they select a program of study, Florida International University (FIU) frontloads career exploration during the application process.
FIU created a four-step process to scale career counseling across its entire applicant pool:
1. Prospective students can take a 10-minute career-matching exercise that asks them about their interests, skills, and ambitions. The exercise is nested among other application requirements to encourage students to complete it.
2. The survey generates a series of ranked career clusters for the student, with each cluster mapped to a major offered at FIU.
3. Students can click through to explore the majors, the degree requirements, and potential career paths.
4. Advisors at FIU receive the survey results for matriculated students to inform major selection conversations.
At FIU, supporting major fit early on has translated into better grades for students who heed the survey results.
In addition, FIU indicates that first-generation students, who often lack the networks that could help guide academic and career planning, find the career exercise and links to majors very helpful in understanding their major options in the context of real career interests.
FIU’s program shows that it is never too early to help students consider career interests and program selection given the impact upon on-time graduation. Moreover, the survey is cost effective and easy for students to participate in as part of the admission process.
See 6 more best practices for supporting student success in the enrollment process
Next in Today's Briefing
Build meta-majors—without the endless back-and-forth