Revitalizing the Program Portfolio

Elevating Academic Program Performance and Strategic Alignment

Topics: Accreditation, Academic Planning, Academic Affairs, Assessment, Program Prioritization, Academic Dashboards, Data Driven University, Administration and Finance, Data Management, Information Technology, Program Market Research, Program Costs, Program Approval, Research Evalution and Rankings, Research Enterprise, Budgeting, Interdisciplinary Programs

This is a preview of restricted content.

  • If you are an EAB member, please log in.
  • If you are logged in and still see this message, the content is outside your membership portfolio, and we invite you to learn more by contacting us.
  • If you are not an EAB member and wish to learn more, please contact us.

By reading this study, members will learn:

  • How to generate faculty consensus around program performance metrics
  • How to align program performance with institutional goals
  • How to determine if proposed programs will be viable
  • How to enhance existing “signature” programs
  • How to reallocate resources based on institutional priorities

Executive Summary

At many institutions, program review is an underproductive exercise. Review of existing programs is often a check-the-box formality, with inconsistent criteria and little connection to institutional priorities or funding considerations. Decisions about where to concentrate resources across the portfolio can be highly politicized. This report profiles how academic planning exemplars use program review as a strategic tool, integrating data on academic quality, student demand, and resource utilization to improve the economics of challenged programs and prioritize programs for investment and expansion.

Top Lessons from the Study