What are the right metrics to measure MGO performance?

Donor pyramids have become increasingly narrow over the past 15 years, raising the stakes for big-gift fundraising. One or two lost gifts at the top could undermine the entire division’s performance. Advancement leaders need their MGOs to operate at maximum efficiency—but they aren't able to adequately evaluate whether their fundraisers are performing to expectations without a data-informed system in place .

You can't discuss MGO performance management without first talking about metrics. Institutions that have successfully addressed the MGO performance dilemma have incorporated metrics into their performance management systems in two key ways:

Problem with Metrics

Recommendation #1: Establish individualized and transparent goals

There is no such thing as a set of "magic metrics" that will automatically increase MGO productivity. Metrics need to be tailored to each advancement shop’s culture, campaign stage, prospect base, and MGO experience.

Instead of engaging in a "game" of reflexive, general, and vague metrics, best practice institutions take a more rigorous approach to create data-based MGO goals, communicate clear expectations, and reward performance effectively.

Read our study Making Meaning of Metrics

  • They rigorously set dollar goals. Instead of haphazardly installing metrics to fix specific conditions within a shop, leading institutions are moving toward a well-planned, holistic, and data-based approach. By calculating the probability that solicitations will occur during a given fiscal year and the probability that those solicitations will close in the same fiscal year, advancement shops can set more realistic MGO fundraising goals.

  • They embed metrics into job descriptions. A true commitment to metrics throughout the MGO lifecycle requires starting well before a candidate joins the advancement team. Introducing MGO candidates to their performance grids during the interview process helps to eliminate the surprise factor around performance accountability later on.

  • They organize performance information with scorecards. Points systems are an efficient way to organize metrics, distill complex information in order of importance, and allow for weightings of activities that are most central to the institution’s specific goals. Advancement leaders should incorporate cash goals, total contact with prospects, and donor retention metrics into visible and accessible MGO scorecards.

Benefits of Using a Points System

Benefits of Using a Points System

Recommendation #2: Create guardrails against perverse incentives

Metrics systems have great potential to boost overall fundraising, but when they're built haphazardly, they can do more harm than good. Under intense pressure to perform on number of visits or solicitations, MGOs might sacrifice the quality of their interactions for higher yield. In addition, MGOs might react negatively to metrics that they deem unfair or overly stringent.

Best practice institutions combat these perverse incentives by motivating MGOs to improve performance across all metrics, emphasizing quality over quantity, and securing MGO buy-in from the outset.

  • They cap total performance points. By capping the total points that an MGO can earn on any given metric, advancement shops successfully recognize stellar performance in one particular strength area while still ensuring that MGOs are motivated to improve performance in growth areas.

  • They adopt a "less is more" approach. In an effort to increase productivity, many advancement shops are experimenting with decreased visit and solicitation goals, allowing MGOs to focus more time and attention on designing high-quality proposals for the best prospects. Institutions that have reduced MGO portfolio size have actually seen increases in the number of asks, number of gifts, and overall dollars raised.

  • They create consensus through committees. Without securing MGO buy-in, the transition to a metrics-based approach will be an uphill battle for advancement leaders. One way we have seen institutions generate buy-in from their MGOs is through a bottom-up approach. MGOs are asked to sit on a committee, explore potential metrics, reach out to peers on best practices, and present their ideas to the leadership team.

Portfolio Size Reduction Yields Manageable Prospect Pool
Portfolio Size Reduction Yields Manageable Prospect Pool

This is a preview of restricted content.

Full access to this content is reserved for Advancement Forum members. Log in now or learn more about Advancement Forum.

Next, Check Out

Gifted and Talented

More
  • Manage Your Events
  • Saved webpages and searches
  • Manage your subscriptions
  • Update personal information
  • Invite a colleague