Three Myths About Competency-Based Education

Separating Fact from Fiction

Learn about the costs, challenges, and risks of CBE launch and uncover three predominant myths about competency-based education.

Three Myths about Competency-Based Education

Based on lessons learned from early movers in CBE, this publication helps members separate the hype about CBE from the costs and the risks of launching a new program.

To help members make informed decisions about CBE launch—as well as educate campus stakeholders on the challenges inherent to the CBE business model—we provide an in-depth analysis of the three predominant myths about CBE.

Download the complete publication or explore the table of contents below to break down popular perceptions about competency-based education.

Defining competency-based education

While there are many definitions and models of CBE across the higher education landscape, the predominant definition in the field for full-fledged CBE programs is that they are characterized by two elements:

1. Credit for competencies, not seat time
CBE programs award academic credit based on mastery of clearly defined competencies, rather than on “seat time.” In traditional education, time is fixed and mastery is variable. In CBE, mastery is fixed and time is variable.

2. Technology-enabled personalization
In CBE programs, technology affords each student a distinct pathway through content based on what they know/don’t know and where they need most support—“personalization at scale.” There are two main types of personalization in CBE programs: personalized pacing and personalized content.

Myth 1: Students and employers are demanding CBE

In reality, students are not searching for CBE and few know what it means. Employers’ interest in CBE is no different than their engagement with traditional programs.

Myth 2: CBE is faster and lower-cost for students

Most students progress at an average pace in CBE and end up paying tuition similar to traditional programs.

Myth 3: CBE is lower-cost for institutions

An immature vendor market and the cost of supporting self-paced learning make CBE programs more expensive to launch and to run than traditional programs.

The CBE and PLA Playbook provides step-by-step guidance to determine whether launching a CBE program is the right fit for their institutions, tools to mitigate the costs and risks of launch, and resources to support continuous improvement in student screening and support.

This is a preview of restricted content.

Full access to this content is reserved for COE Forum members. Log in now or learn more about COE Forum.

Next, Check Out

The CBE and PLA Playbook

  • Manage Your Events
  • Saved webpages and searches
  • Manage your subscriptions
  • Update personal information
  • Invite a colleague